I just came across the Nielsen Company’s 2008 Guide to the Super Bowl and I thought I’d give my take on the numbers that were provided. My commentary will be sarcastic italicized.
Among the key findings from Nielsen:
I have nothing against Nielsen. I think they do the best with the numbers they have but I think they’re lacking some context.
- TELEVISION: As usual, the 2007 Super Bowl was the highest rated TV show in the U.S. for the year attracting more than 93 million TV viewers.
Is it really that tough to beat the abysmal ratings TV get’s these days? What’s their closest competitor? Are they loosing ground to other types of programing or not?
- ONLINE: Super Bowl 2007 advertisers saw a collective 50% increase in Web traffic the day after the big game, from 8.5 million unique visitors on Super Bowl Sunday to 12.7 million unique visitors on Monday. Budweiser brands generated the most online buzz.
Here’s what I mean by context. How much traffic do these sites normally get from Sunday to Monday? Sunday is normally a slow day on the Internet anyway.
- THE ADVERTISERS: The cost for a 30-second commercial during the 2007 game was $2.38 million down from $2.5 million in 2006. Total spending for the 2007 game reached over $161.8 million. In 2007, Anheuser-Busch aired the most commercial time, while Cadillac had the most sponsorship air-time.
Wow, that’s practically a deal; $2.38 million. I really hope HP doesn’t advertise this year, here’s the ad they ran last year in case you already forgot what it was (I did).
- MUSIC: Halftime and pre-game performances have provided sales growth for music artists since the early ’90s. After last year’s Super Bowl halftime, Billboard reported that Prince’s album sales more than doubled.
Once again, a little context please. How many had he sold before that. If he’d only sold 5, selling 6 more would “more than double” his sales.
- BOX OFFICE AND DVD SALES: Box Office sales continue to be lower on Super Bowl Sunday vs. typical Sundays in the winter months. The top selling Super Bowl-related DVD since 2000 is SUPER BOWL XXXVIII, featuring the Patriots and the Panthers.
Maybe they’d sell more DVD’s if they included the commercials. Isn’t that why most people watch the game?
- SHOPPING TRENDS: During the Super Bowl period, snack food had the largest incremental increase in total sales and alcoholic beverage coolers had the largest percentage increase.
Gee really? Couldn’t have guessed that. Is there an increase of sales on game day for those snack foods that advertise on Super Bowl Sunday?
- DEMOGRAPHICS OF FOOTBALL FANS: People in wealthy homes, which generally have more than a $100,000 income, are almost three times more likely to watch the Super Bowl as people in homes with less than $30,000 in annual income.
This number really drives me crazy. Someone with a household income under 30k is probably working at the Wal-Mart you bought your snacks from right before the game and is most likely still there at half time when you run back for more beer.
NY Giants fans are more than twice as likely as New York adults to have bought sporting event tickets online within the past year. 15% of Boston’s Patriots fans belong to a household with an annual income of $150k or more.
Last time I checked it was the New England Patriots not just Boston. I’d be willing to bet that at least 15% of Boston households make more than $150k. What about the rest of Massachusetts? Or the rest of New England?
Like I said, I have nothing against Nielsen, but I’m beginning to wonder if they aren’t just highlighting numbers that make their network clients happy.
Technorati Tags: Super Bowl,Nielsen,TV,advertising
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
- post by tacanderson